Facebook Exchange: A Long Term Distraction for FB Stock

There has been much discussion in the nerdosphere about Facebook’s move last week to debut their ad exchange: a form of retargeting visitors to an advertiser’s web page when they are back in the friendly confines of Facebook.com. Layer on top of this a real-time bidding (RTB) engine, and you have advertisers rejoicing that Facebook is finally listening to market demands.

But here’s the rub: Facebook isn’t designed to be an advertising network. It’s designed to be a content consumption experience.

Advertisers have an inherent demand for commoditizing advertising across the Internet, because it naturally builds in scale for buys. This is great for building up ad revenue from the vast majority of ad dollars dedicated to maintaining the status quo.

The sad part is that consumers often have a non-scientifically correlated “stay the f*** away from me” demand from interruptive advertising. The average click through rate on a Facebook right rail ad is 0.05%.

Compare that to the view-through rate of posts on Facebook: damn near 100%. With in-stream Sponsored Stories, Facebook was aligning itself with its core user experience: connecting people with stories that make them feel good, inspired or educated.

The Challenge

This marks the most challenging part about building a monetization system: where do you draw a line between incorporating commoditized ad units vs a native platform which aligns with your user intent?

On one side: advertisers want what is familiar (commoditized ad units). It’s easy because you (the agency/advertiser) maintain your processes. From a product perspective, this is known as low hanging fruit. It’s easy money, so you take it and compare yourself to other ad buys.

On the other side: 99.9% of engagement with your site (assuming a 0.1% page ad CTR) is not generating revenue. While FB Exchange is priced on CPM, the clicks are really where the money lies. 99.9% is a really big number of untouched revenue.

It makes sense why Facebook is making this change. It’s been getting beat down by investors, claiming that the Mighty Zucks aren’t responsive to big name advertisers like GM.

This move will slow down the negative momentum, so I get it. The other part it slows down, though, is the drive to create great content and distribute it wisely across the Facebook ecosystem.

In the long run, this FB exchange will likely prove more a distraction than a key, disruptive revenue driver.


Marketing is Holding Back Marketing on Facebook

Over the past weekend, I spent some time in Orange County, CA, well outside of the tech bubble. I was shocked by how many people I spoke to didn’t realize that Facebook made over $2B last year. Less surprising, but more indicative of the challenges Facebook faces is what it means to market your business.

A lawyer with over 30 years of experience was telling me that he was excited to launch his firm’s Facebook page so that he could list all of the cases that they win. This is precisely the GM challenge: nobody cares what you did and how you looked good.

Today’s Facebook (and all other social, for that matter) is about aligning your brand to provide content that will enhance your followers’ overall experience. In the case of the law firm: update your followers with new legislation that passes and your firm’s POV on how it can impact potential clients.

The content needs to be about how it impacts your followers, not to toot your own horn. Check out what Pepsi is doing on Facebook. They become part of the Facebook experience; not a distraction to it.


Facebook IPO: Odd Lots Galore

Image of the day: you can really get a sense for how retail trading is taking place in today’s Facebook IPO.

Typically shares trade in round “lots” which traders executes in magnitudes of 100. This makes it easier to align bids and asks and how most counterparties agree to a price.

In some cases, when you have retail buyers, who are buying more on how much they can “afford” at say $5,000 or $10,000, you get what’s known as an odd lot - a trade that has a non-divisible-by-100 amount of shares. Looks like it’s going gangbusters on the retail front.


Tags: facebook